Top

What Really Went On When Obama Went To Bozeman?

August 21, 2009

Below is a letter sent out to friends by people who actually attended the Obama town hall meeting at the Belgrade Airport in a remote area outside the city of Bozeman, Montana. This information never made it to the press, partly because the press was shielded from even being able to see the thuggery and intimidation.

~~~~~~~

Hello All,

By now you have probably heard that President Obama came to Montana last Friday. However, there are many things that the major news has not covered. I feel that since Bill and I live here and we were at the airport on Friday I should share some facts with you. Whatever you decide to do with the information is up to you. If you chose to share this email with others I do ask that you DELETE my email address before you forward this on.

On Wednesday, August 5th it was announced locally that the President would be coming here. There are many groups here that are against his healthcare and huge spending so those groups began talking and deciding on what they were going to do. The White House would not release ANY details other than the date. Read more

Veterans Fight to Keep 75-yr. old Mojave Desert Memorial cross

July 2, 2009

Tyrannical Rube Calls One With Differing Opinion A Troglodyte, Luddite

May 20, 2009

Somehow self-proclaimed intelligent people believe that by utilizing impressive lexicon in their ad hominem attacks against anyone who opposes their views is dignified. I liken it to a preamble to a vicious insult on a fellow human that might go something like this: “With all due respect……., or meaning no offense.” Of course this is immediately followed by regurgitated vitriol aimed at humiliating the other person in order to somehow prop oneself up to be something they are not.

Name calling is name calling no matter what color lipstick you try to put on it. This is a long lived tactic for anyone who can offer no facts or new information to a discussion. It is used by everyone but seems to be most prominent in attempted discussions with liberals whose main focus seems to be on promoting their progressive lifestyles. It’s a bit like dealing with a spoiled child who is insisting on having their way. Read more

Bozell Challenges FCC Chair Copps to Call on Speaker Pelosi and Leader Reid to Allow a Vote on the Broadcaster Freedom Act

May 19, 2009

Alexandria, VA – Acting Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Chairman Michael Copps offered his view last Thursday that the anti-free speech Censorship Doctrine, also mis-known as the “Fairness” Doctrine is “long gone” and that “it’s not coming back.”

But for the second time in a week, Chairman Copps called those who are concerned about its return “conspiracy theorists” who are engaged in “issue mongering” by “resurrecting the straw man of a bye-gone Fairness Doctrine.”

Media Research Center (MRC) President Brent Bozell today reminded Chairman Copps of just some of the many members of Congress who have recently called for a return of the so-called “Fairness” Doctrine: Read more

The Utterly Dispicable Sign Of Our Times

May 2, 2009

The Left’s New Back-Door Strategy to Silence Talk Radio

May 1, 2009

The Left is launching a new and more deceptive strategy to implement the so-called “Fairness” Doctrine — under different names and without a vote in Congress. But their goal remains the same – the silencing of conservative and Christian talk radio.

Obama’s Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is preparing to use regulatory terms like “diversity,” “localism” and serving the Left’s definition of the “public interest” as new, backdoor “Fairness” Doctrines to indirectly impose radio censorship. This new line of attack could be implemented without a vote in Congress and without ever using the name “Fairness” Doctrine. Read more

Let’s Not Call It Swine Flu. What Will The Pigs Think?

April 29, 2009

Seriously though, Janet Napolitano and other officials want the name “swine” taken out of the name for the recent viral infection threatening to send the world into pandemic pandemonium. Evidently it’s not the pigs directly that the Obama administration fears offending, although I’m sure it has been discussed, it is the dangers that might result to the pork industry.

I have just one question and I’m going to attempt to keep it clean. If Obama is so concerned about hurting the pork industry, why are we allowed to call pointless spending pork? Certainly people must be repulsed by the use of the word pork to describe Congress. I mean, can you imagine being associated with politicians? Ewwwwww! Gross! Remember this past campaign season? How many times did Obama put lipstick on a pig? So insensitive! I bet he got no votes from the pork industry. Read more

« Previous Page

Bottom