Washington Post describes Bush as Incompetent

Unreal! After reading an article this morning titled, Bush the Incompetent, I nearly spit my coffee out all over my computer screen from rage. Of course they give Bush the benefit of the doubt saying that incompetence isn’t exactly one of the seven deadly sins…

Incompetence is not one of the seven deadly sins, and it’s hardly the worst attribute that can be ascribed to George W. Bush. But it is this president’s defining attribute.

Oh yea, and that is how the article begins. The article continues…

Historians, looking back at the hash that his administration has made of his war in Iraq, his response to Hurricane Katrina and his Medicare drug plan, will have to grapple with how one president could so cosmically botch so many big things — particularly when most of them were the president’s own initiatives.

OK first off… look at the last 3 words… “president’s own initiatives”. Yes, and Bush initiated Hurricane Katrina to hit Chocolate City because of his hatred towards black folk. When he saw there were too many still alive he had the levees blown up. He sure botched that one.

War on Iraq? Well, he initiated that one by starting the war, having planes fly into the world trade center.

It is obvious we are looking at complete hatred towards Bush in this article, trying to have him appear as not only “botching” everything, but as initiating all his “bitchiness”….

Article continues…

In numbing profusion, the newspapers are filled with litanies of screw-ups. Yesterday’s New York Times brought news of the first official assessment of our reconstruction efforts in Iraq, in which the government’s special inspector general depicted a policy beset, as Times reporter James Glanz put it, “by gross understaffing, a lack of technical expertise, bureaucratic infighting [and] secrecy.” At one point, rebuilding efforts were divided, bewilderingly and counterproductively, between the Army Corps of Engineers and, for projects involving water, the Navy. That’s when you’d think a president would make clear in no uncertain terms that bureaucratic turf battles would not be allowed to impede Iraq’s reconstruction. But then, the president had no guiding vision for how to rebuild Iraq — indeed, he went to war believing that such an undertaking really wouldn’t require much in the way of American treasure and American lives.

ahem… what??

I would like to focus on the last sentence here and especially the last 2 words. I remember President Bush saying once prior to entering Iraq that this war will cost American lives and some believed this to be a bloodier war than what actually came about. So don’t go making stupid remarks saying Bush didn’t believe American lives were at stake. American treasure?? Wasn’t it Bush who asked for how much?? …and people scoffed at him and didn’t want to provide the resources until after the military demanded armor. Then it was Bush’s fault for not spending enough on armor.

This article is crap and complete hogwash… I can’t believe people get paid to write such stupidity.

I remember once, somebody said to me Bush sounds so dumb speaking because he repeats himself over and over again and never says anything new. My answer was, if people didn’t keep asking the same stupid questions then they wouldn’t get the same stupid answers. And this is just what his entire presidency has been like. He repeats himself over and over again with facts yet liberals still fail to hear him. They bend and twist the truth and want to know answers so they ask and he tells them again and again, but the hatred is so thick they have shut their ears.

* OK my rant is over… thanks and come again… *